(Please let me know if I should ask this in another forum instead)
Hi guys! I want to capture a "reasonable quality" model of a person's body, for measurements.
The demands are pretty low: no facial details necessary, and texture doesn't matter. The person being scanned could conceivably be standing still, and wear a dress with a grid reference points on it to improve accuracy. I've done some 3D scanning of static objects with a single 10MP Casio and multiple shots around the object, with great results with PhotoScan.
For a human body however, even standing as still as they can, a multi-camera setup is obviously necessary for good results.
Here's my question: How many cameras, and what resolution, would I need for say 1x1 inch resolution with max +-1/4 inch error? Do you guys have any idea what I would need for this type of photogrammetry on the super cheap? I'm looking at buying a bunch of remote-triggered compact cameras and building something like the
40 x Raspberry Pi 3D scanner, but with the physical shutter and higher megapixel count in a compact camera.
I've been lurking here for a while and somebody posted about somebody getting great results with as few as 12 cameras. I was not able to figure out who that was though, or where to read more about it.
Do you think I could get by with as little as 4 cameras? Should I go for 4 high quality DLSRs instead of 12 compacts?
I'm a poor student without a job and will buy everything on eBay, so I'm looking to spend no more than $500 on cameras, if possible. That is why I'm asking here first instead of just getting a bunch cameras and see how it goes; I can't really afford to waste $500 on something that was doomed from the start anyway.